Jordan Peterson Michael Eric Dyson Michelle Goldberg Stephen Fry

Political correctness: a force for good? A Munk Debate

Culture & SocietyTeamAdded 4d ago

This Munk Debate tackles the contentious issue of political correctness, framed by the resolution: "What you call political correctness, I call progress." The debate features two teams arguing for and against this proposition. On one side, Jordan Peterson and Stephen Fry contend that "political correctness" is a detrimental force, potentially stifling free speech, critical thought, and individual liberty, and that its pursuit can lead to unintended negative societal consequences. They likely argue against what they perceive as an overreach of identity politics and a chilling effect on open discourse. On the opposing side, Michael Eric Dyson and Michelle Goldberg defend "political correctness" as a necessary and positive driver of social progress. They likely assert that these efforts are crucial for promoting inclusivity, challenging systemic inequalities, and fostering a more equitable and respectful society, viewing it as a vital tool for addressing historical injustices and advancing marginalized groups.

#Free Speech #Identity Politics #Censorship #Social Justice #Political Correctness #Public Discourse #Social Progress #Culture Wars #Munk Debates #Wokeness

Speaker roster

Competitive voting and results are currently available for duel debates only. This team debate is fully viewable and commentable, and broader format support will follow later.

Jordan Peterson Michael Eric Dyson Michelle Goldberg Stephen Fry